Seriously?
Someone please tell me WHY we would put our closer in when we are tied in the 9th inning! Why not put in Wheeler or Qualls (or even Borkowski) while we're tied, and then wait until we take the lead before putting in Lidge? If I'm not mistaken, that is the purpose of a closer: to CLOSE. And then another poor decision (after we have tied the game again in the bottom of the 9th): put in Miller?? What is that about? Poor managing.
I must admit, I didn't think Wilson had it in him, but he did pull through in the clutch...it's just too bad that our pitching staff couldn't pull through.
How about Chris Burke? Not only is he easy on the eyes (VERY easy on the eyes), but he rocks! He had 3 doubles the other day...nice. He's hitting .383 this month, and against lefties, he's .536. And he may be shaping up to take Bigg's place as the hitter to be hit. Speaking of, he reminds me a lot of Biggio: the way he plays like a kid, the way he hustles, the way he's willing to take one for the team. There's just one thing: I have never seen anyone chew gum like this guy. He is serious about his gum!
I must admit, I didn't think Wilson had it in him, but he did pull through in the clutch...it's just too bad that our pitching staff couldn't pull through.
How about Chris Burke? Not only is he easy on the eyes (VERY easy on the eyes), but he rocks! He had 3 doubles the other day...nice. He's hitting .383 this month, and against lefties, he's .536. And he may be shaping up to take Bigg's place as the hitter to be hit. Speaking of, he reminds me a lot of Biggio: the way he plays like a kid, the way he hustles, the way he's willing to take one for the team. There's just one thing: I have never seen anyone chew gum like this guy. He is serious about his gum!
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home